Monday, June 23, 2025 — HAN
Washington, D.C. – Several U.S. Democratic lawmakers have strongly condemned President Donald Trump’s recent military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, calling the move unconstitutional and urging his removal from office.
The backlash follows Trump’s authorization of a surprise military operation late last night, known as “Operation Midnight Hammer,” which targeted three key nuclear storage sites in Iran. The decision has sparked both legal and political controversy.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York, wrote in a public statement:
“The president’s disastrous decision to bomb Iran without Congressional approval is a serious violation of the Constitution and the War Powers of Congress.”
“He has endangered the nation by hastily initiating a conflict that could affect generations to come. This is a clear and urgent reason to remove him from office.” She added.
The strike has intensified debates in Washington over presidential war powers and the role of Congress in authorizing military action.
This comes amid a wave of strong reactions following President Trump’s decision to carry out an uncalculated airstrike.
Global Reactions to Trump’s Strike on Iran Nuclear Facilities
Russia
- Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov warned such action would “radically destabilize the entire situation” and risked bringing the world “millimeters” from nuclear catastrophe .
- Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova echoed the concern, stressing the dire environmental and security consequences .
Gulf States (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar)
- Leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar privately urged Trump to avoid strikes, warning any attack could provoke severe retaliation targeting their countries .
- They emphasized that a diplomatic resolution and a new nuclear deal would better preserve regional stability .
United Kingdom
- Prime Minister Keir Starmer convened an emergency (COBRA) meeting and urged diplomatic solutions, reinforcing that Iran “must never have a nuclear weapon” .
- The UK, alongside Germany and China, urged restraint and called for stopping military escalation .
European Leaders
- Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz considered Israel’s strikes justifiable but warned against further escalation .
- France’s President Emmanuel Macron and the EU strongly defended the 2015 nuclear deal, denouncing the strike as undermining global nuclear agreements .
- EU officials noted the strike damages trust in diplomatic frameworks upheld by the UN and IAEA .
United Nations
- UN Secretary-General António Guterres and other officials called for maximum restraint, warning that the region—and the world—cannot justify another war in the Gulf .
China
- The Chinese Foreign Ministry characterized U.S. military action as “opposed to sovereignty” and urged a cessation of force, advocating diplomacy as the only viable path .
Summary & Implications
- Widespread international condemnation: Many nations, especially in Europe and Asia, denounced the strike as reckless and constitutionally dubious.
- Gulf concern over blowback: Regional allies warned of direct security threats following such military action.
- Diplomacy remains the favored route: From London to Beijing to Brussels, diplomatic engagement and revival of the nuclear agreement are being seen as the optimal solutions.
- UN global warning: Continued escalation risks broader conflict across the Middle East.
In essence, global leaders have largely held Trump’s strike responsible for endangering regional stability and undermining diplomatic gains—calling urgently for restraint and a return to multilateral negotiations.
